From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: improving query-replace and query-replace-regexp Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 06:57:23 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040529105723.GD27145@fencepost> References: <20040528.182035.197345599.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085828317 31305 80.91.224.253 (29 May 2004 10:58:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 10:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 12:58:32 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BU1Xs-0001kT-00 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 12:58:32 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BU1Xr-0002sM-00 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 12:58:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BU1Xw-0002Jk-Oc for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 06:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BU1Xq-0002Jf-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 06:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BU1Xq-0002JT-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 06:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BU1Xq-0002JQ-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 06:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BU1Wq-0005qo-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 06:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BU1Wl-0001dN-53; Sat, 29 May 2004 06:57:23 -0400 Original-To: Werner LEMBERG Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040528.182035.197345599.wl@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24153 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24153 On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:20:35PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > What do you think of making M-% and C-M-% b behave similar to C-s and > C-u C-s? This is, typing it a second time continues a previous > query-and-replace action. This would save a lot of time. It's not necessary -- as those commands use normal minibuffer input, you can just use the normal minibuffer history mechanism (M-p, etc). -Miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen