From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display word wrapping Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:33:27 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040526213327.GA14004@fencepost> References: <20040526125439.GA10795@fencepost> <20040526194515.GB29575@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085609474 30700 80.91.224.253 (26 May 2004 22:11:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 22:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu May 27 00:11:07 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BT6c7-0007mo-00 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:11:07 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BT6c7-0002qu-00 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:11:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BT6QA-00024c-2y for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT6ON-0001eC-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT6Nn-0001Vk-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BT61i-0004lB-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:33:30 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BT61f-0003wa-9E; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:33:27 -0400 Original-To: "Kim F. Storm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23982 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23982 On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:01:41PM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote: > > Gnus is "safe", it's important, > > So upgrading to the new Gnus is seamless?!?! _Nothing_ is seamless, but the version of Gnus proposed for merging is apparently very stable (it's been the Gnus "stable" version for a year). Anyway, in my opinion, Emacs should not be released without a Gnus update, even if it delays the release by some amount. Waiting until the next Emacs release would be absurd. -Miles -- My spirit felt washed. With blood. [Eli Shin, on "The Passion of the Christ"]