From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new *Help* argument highlighting Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 21:54:42 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200405181254.VAA10638@etlken.m17n.org> References: <20040512133037.FB60.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> <200405121301.WAA11314@etlken.m17n.org> <20040512150550.FB66.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> <20040512140625.GA20095@fencepost> <m33c65n661.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <20040512221825.GA30731@fencepost> <200405170114.KAA06235@etlken.m17n.org> <buohdufzsxn.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084909337 5459 80.91.224.253 (18 May 2004 19:42:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 19:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue May 18 21:42:02 2004 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org> Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQATR-0002GZ-00 for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:42:01 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQATR-00033X-00 for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:42:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQ4uf-00039e-86 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 09:45:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQ4sn-0002tE-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 09:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQ4sF-0002ks-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 09:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQ47a-0004GQ-7j; Tue, 18 May 2004 08:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4ICsgQ11836; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:54:43 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4ICsgW21935; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:54:42 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id VAA10638; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:54:42 +0900 (JST) Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-reply-to: <buohdufzsxn.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles Bader on 17 May 2004 11:30:28 +0900) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23654 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23654 In article <buohdufzsxn.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>, Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes: > Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org> writes: >> > But it hardly makes a difference -- the first line of doc: comments >> > in C-code DEFUNs are typically indented so much that they usually >> > _already_ go way past the left margin. >> >> In such a case, can't we put the docstring as this? >> >> doc: /* >> Long long long long long long long long long first line of the docstring. > You could I suppose (though I don't know if that has any funny > interaction with the doc-string processing code), I used such format in emacs-unicode branch and it seems that doc-string processing code has no problem with that format. > but people don't seem > to, and instead just let the line overflow. Perhaps that's because > c-mode, if given the chance, will screw up the indentation of such a > line, so it can be a pain to _keep_ that way (e.g., if you type a */ at > the end the line, bang, c-mode will put the indentation back...). Yes. If we are going to promote that format, we should adjust the behaviour of c-mode. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org