From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tramp with global-auto-revert-mode. Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:50:06 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200405150250.i4F2o6W26114@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200405122254.i4CMsUj29445@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200405122326.i4CNQk929511@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200405132324.i4DNOBs14811@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200405140008.i4E08lb14858@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <871xln4xmc.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200405140132.i4E1WaH15085@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87vfiz3fez.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200405140308.i4E38b415540@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87pt973b7y.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084589790 25431 80.91.224.253 (15 May 2004 02:56:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 02:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kai@emptydomain.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 15 04:56:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BOpLY-0003CI-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 04:56:20 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BOpLY-0006Sb-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 04:56:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOpJc-0005fG-Ci for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 22:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOpJG-0005ep-Sk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 22:53:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOpIk-0005Cx-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 22:53:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BOpIj-0005CI-Ob for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 22:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOpG0-0007id-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 22:50:37 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4F2oHTS005009; Fri, 14 May 2004 21:50:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id i4F2o6W26114; Fri, 14 May 2004 21:50:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23462 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23462 This time I have again trouble reading an argument and maybe this time that is not just due to my failure to read etc/DEBUG carefully enough. We get at: #7 (match-string 6 "/ssh:raven.dms.auburn.edu:/home/teirllm/") #10 #[(name) "" [] 8 ("" . 211858)] #13 #[(filename) "" [] 6 ("" . 2640)] #16 #[(filename) "" [] 3 ("" . 119402)] #19 (tramp-file-name-handler expand-file-name "" "/ssh:raven.dms.auburn.edu:/home/teirllm/") #23 (file-readable-p ??? (gdb) up 4 #23 0x0813ca53 in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0xbfffcf20) at eval.c:2726 2726 val = (*XSUBR (fun)->function) (internal_args[0]); (gdb) p *args $33 = 138327097 (gdb) pr file-readable-p (gdb) p args[1] $40 = 144357203 (gdb) xtype Lisp_String (gdb) xstring $41 = (struct Lisp_String *) 0x89ab750 Invalid number -2147483598 of repetitions. Could this be relevant to the bug in xbacktrace? Remember: (gdb) xbacktrace Invalid number -2147483625 of repetitions. After that, I absent-mindedly produced a SIGSEGV again. Sincerely, Luc.