From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 11:13:41 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040503111040.8C52.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> References: <20040503001844.BB2C.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083575762 9253 80.91.224.253 (3 May 2004 09:16:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 09:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon May 03 11:15:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKZYK-0005Li-00 for ; Mon, 03 May 2004 11:15:56 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKZYK-0003wJ-00 for ; Mon, 03 May 2004 11:15:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKZWw-0005kO-Ot for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 05:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKZWi-0005fi-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 05:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKZWB-00050F-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 05:14:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.181.117] (helo=idefix.laley.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKZWA-00050A-MF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 05:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.17.221.23] (jsredondo.wk.org [172.17.221.23]) by idefix.laley.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2655.55) id JN3LLBXM; Mon, 3 May 2004 11:13:08 +0200 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.08.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22591 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22591 On 03 May 2004 07:44:18 +0200 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) wrote: > In my book "feature freeze" does not completely exclude tiny > enhancements (like this one) going in; rather it is a "state of mind" > on the developers concentrating on _finalizing_ what's already there > rather than _adding_ new stuff. I agree, but I'd rather ask than step on somebody's toes. Thanks, Juanma