From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: winner.el vs. simple.el Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 18:28:46 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040502181350.19AB.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> References: <40880A68.5090305@yahoo.com> <20040423013154.3E8E.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083516199 14039 80.91.224.253 (2 May 2004 16:43:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 16:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun May 02 18:43:02 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKK3S-00038S-00 for ; Sun, 02 May 2004 18:43:02 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKK3S-0004QJ-00 for ; Sun, 02 May 2004 18:43:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKK1o-0001nl-RD for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 02 May 2004 12:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKK16-0001mI-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2004 12:40:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKK0a-0001XM-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2004 12:40:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1BKK0a-0000lp-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2004 12:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.81.186.19] (helo=smtp09.retemail.es) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKJpo-0003Y0-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2004 12:28:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([213.37.34.26]) by smtp09.retemail.es (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20040502162845.XWQE25645.smtp09.retemail.es@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 18:28:45 +0200 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040423013154.3E8E.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22540 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22540 > On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:09:44 -0600, Kevin Rodgers > wrote: > > I suggest moving the winner commands to C-c left and C-c right. Ok, so options are: a) Do nothing. The compatibility issue should be mentioned on NEWS so old winner users know they must re-bind winner-(undo|redo), or buffer-(left|right). b) Assigning another keybindings for buffer-(left|right). Not a good idea because they are in general much more useful than winner-*. c) Changing winner-(undo|redo) to C-c (left|right). d) As c) but extending the current `winner-dont-bind-my-keys' boolean variable to a three-state with values like: nil -> don't bind w-(u|r) t -> bind w-(u|r) to C-c (l|r) 'old -> bind w-(u|r) to C-x (l|r) e) As c), with a new `winner-bind-incompatible-keys' (name irrelevant) defaulting to nil, so by default the binding is as now. Preferences, anyone? /L/e/k/t/u