From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two questions about thumbs.el Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:58:05 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040426184621.1D6B.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> References: <20040426104147.5042.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083000380 3735 80.91.224.253 (26 Apr 2004 17:26:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 26 19:26:03 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BI9rn-00052G-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:26:03 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BI9rn-00050O-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:26:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BI9nb-00072P-Df for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:21:43 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BI9lW-0006Lb-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BI9YF-0003CL-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.81.186.19] (helo=smtp09.retemail.es) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BI9Qo-0000ZL-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:58:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([213.37.34.34]) by smtp09.retemail.es (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20040426165738.PZMK16399.smtp09.retemail.es@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:57:38 +0200 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22187 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22187 On 26 Apr 2004 18:39:21 +0200, storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) wrote: > This functionality is obviously generally useful. > Maybe time-less-p should be defined in subr.el? time-less-p, time-subtract, time-add, time-to-days, time-to-day-in-year and date-leap-year-p are all documented on the *Time Calculations* node of the Emacs Lisp manual. It feels a bit weird to have one on subr.el and the rest on calendar/time-date.el OTOH, it seems like time-less-p is the only one generally used, so I suppose you're right. Opinions? /L/e/k/t/u