From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IELM prompt Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:27:31 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200404250127.i3P1RVD17278@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <20040425012954.516F.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <200404242351.i3ONphr17120@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <20040425021531.5172.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082856801 27367 80.91.224.253 (25 Apr 2004 01:33:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 25 03:33:15 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BHYWB-0001Zy-00 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 03:33:15 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BHYWB-0006Tx-00 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 03:33:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BHYUZ-0006oc-1U for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:31:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BHYUB-0006oK-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BHYTf-0006aE-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BHYTf-0006aA-K7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3P1UdTS006913; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:30:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id i3P1RVD17278; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:27:31 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: lektu@mi.madritel.es In-reply-to: <20040425021531.5172.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> (message from Juanma Barranquero on Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:40:18 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22113 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22113 Juanma Barranquero wrote: Personally, I think it'd be better to just do (when (= (point-min) (point-max)) ;; Add a silly header (insert ielm-header) ...) and *not* insert the header when restarting the process, just when the *ielm* buffer is created the first time around. Opinions? The header in: ELISP> C-c C-c Process ielm interrupt *** Welcome to IELM *** Type (describe-mode) for help. ELISP> gives an indication that the process was restarted. (Maybe it can be argued that the new prompt already does that.) _Maybe_: ELISP> C-c C-c Process ielm interrupt Process ielm restarted ELISP> might be better, but probably the repeated header is good enough. Sincerely, Luc.