From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compilation to native Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:28:58 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200404080028.JAA26580@etlken.m17n.org> References: <87eks0654s.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> <87n06bp4ng.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> <8765cwkejr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <200404071157.UAA25094@etlken.m17n.org> <200404071312.WAA25268@etlken.m17n.org> <87zn9nqras.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1081385021 16350 80.91.224.253 (8 Apr 2004 00:43:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, matt@mundell.ukfsn.org, dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 08 02:43:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BBNdi-0008Tk-00 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 02:43:30 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BBNdh-0003Ya-00 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 02:43:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BBNcy-0003Hf-Aj for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BBNco-0003Fd-Qg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BBNcX-0003At-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:42:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1BBNaA-0007nY-O6; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BBNPs-0006h1-4r; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:29:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i380Sx825353; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:28:59 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i380Sw914393; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:28:59 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id JAA26580; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:28:58 +0900 (JST) Original-To: alex@emacswiki.org In-reply-to: <87zn9nqras.fsf@emacswiki.org> (message from Alex Schroeder on Thu, 08 Apr 2004 01:52:43 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21326 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21326 In article <87zn9nqras.fsf@emacswiki.org>, Alex Schroeder writes: > I used HEAD for several months, and have since switched to the unicode > branch for several months. I still experience a crash or two a month, > which is bad, but I cannot say I noticed any difference between the > two. Could you please report the detail of the crash? Aren't there any backtrace information? > As for third party packages, I'm using the unicode branch with Gnus > and ERC (IRC client) for heavy duty work every day, so clearly I think > the Unicode branch is ready for merging, feature freeze, testing, and > release as soon as possible. > I must confess, however, that I have hoped all this time that the bidi > branch would be merged into the unicode branch, and that we'd release > the stuff as Emacs 22... Even fickle Arabic and Hebrew support is > better than no support at all... And for all it's worth, I've used > the bidi branch for IRC as well! :) When I set enable-bidi-display to t in Emacs of emacs-bidi branch, it crashes as soon as it tries to display Hebrew or Arabic. I have not yet been able to find a time to investigate it. :-( --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org