From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] leim/Makefile.in: make distclean should make clean Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:42:57 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200402161142.UAA18057@etlken.m17n.org> References: <87y8r4i27c.fsf@marant.org> <200402152335.IAA17134@etlken.m17n.org> <2914-Mon16Feb2004113906+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1076931940 19909 80.91.224.253 (16 Feb 2004 11:45:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jmarant@nerim.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 16 12:45:28 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AshBo-00022R-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:28 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AshBc-0000Uo-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AshBC-0001bQ-Hx for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AshA3-0001az-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1Ash9W-0001TG-QH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:43:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ash9V-0001T9-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:43:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/3.7W-20010518204228) with ESMTP id i1GBgwd02948; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:42:58 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/3.7W-20010823150639) with ESMTP id i1GBgwE08331; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:42:58 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id UAA18057; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:42:57 +0900 (JST) Original-To: eliz@elta.co.il In-reply-to: <2914-Mon16Feb2004113906+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19967 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19967 In article <2914-Mon16Feb2004113906+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>, "Eli Zaretskii" writes: >> > make distclean in leim/Makefile.in doesn't currently make clean. >> > I've attached a patch. >> >> Thank you, I've just installed it. > I'm not sure we should install that change as it is: it will cause > "make distclean" to remove some of the files that are distributed as > part of the Leim tarball. For example, cyrillic.elc is removed by > "make clean", but it is also part of leim-NN.MM.tar.gz, AFAICS. And > there are others. ?? Do we still make the Leim tarball? > Perhaps the `clean' target needs to be changed as well. I see your point. The target clean is documented as this in top Makefile.in. ### `clean' ### Delete all files from the current directory that are normally ### created by building the program. Don't delete the files that ### record the configuration. Also preserve files that could be made ### by building, but normally aren't because the distribution comes ### with them. It seems that distclean also should not delete *.elc. About maintainer-clean and extraclean, I'm not sure if we should delete *.elc or not. As they don't delete lisp/*.elc, perhaps, it is better not to delete leim/*/*.elc. Then, only the case that we should delete leim/*/*.elc is at bootstrapping time. Is it right? --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org