From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Info enhancements (was: Re: HTML as info format)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:26:59 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200312021926.hB2JQxB27349@f7.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070399862 4056 80.91.224.253 (2 Dec 2003 21:17:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 21:17:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 02 22:17:39 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ARHtr-0000RE-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:17:39 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ARHtr-00033x-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:17:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ARIgS-0004ZG-Hw
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:07:52 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ARH9F-0005R0-6J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:29:29 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ARH8S-0004lJ-UG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:29:12 -0500
Original-Received: from [209.61.216.22] (helo=f7.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ARH8E-0004fb-7g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:28:26 -0500
Original-Received: (from karl@localhost)
	by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id hB2JQxB27349;
	Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:26:59 -0500
Original-To: eliz@elta.co.il
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18294
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18294

    > From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
    > Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:18:09 +0200
    > 
    > Yes, using anchors might be a more clean solution, but it has one
    > drawback: it will generate too many excessive references in the tag
    > table for its Info file.  And these references will be mixed up with
    > node names, e.g. in the completion list of `Info-goto-node'.

    Perhaps there should be a way to tell Info-goto-node to complete on
    node names only, or maybe we should have two distinct commands, one
    which considers only nodes, the other which considers all entries in
    the tag tables.

Once again I've been removed from the thread.  What is under discussion now?

I doubt having two different completion commands would make users happy.