From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: go to bottom of mail message Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:04:36 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200311200804.RAA17125@etlken.m17n.org> References: <200311191126.hAJBQY6C008722@beta.mvs.co.il> <200311191155.UAA15601@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069315828 8982 80.91.224.253 (20 Nov 2003 08:10:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ehud@unix.mvs.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 20 09:10:25 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMjtR-0008Jo-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:10:25 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMjtR-0001h9-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:10:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMkpB-000383-Rb for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:10:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMkoo-00030K-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:09:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMklZ-0000qz-Kt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:06:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMklI-0000hj-DW; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:06:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/3.7W-20010518204228) with ESMTP id hAK84bh21369; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:04:37 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6/3.7W-20010823150639) with ESMTP id hAK84bs05822; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:04:37 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id RAA17125; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:04:36 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:17 -0500) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17950 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17950 In article , Richard Stallman writes: > (2) I've just noticed that > rmail-summary-beginning-of-message works slightly > differently than rmail-beginnig-of-message. The formar > moves point to the really beginning of a message, but the > latter moves point to the beginning of a BODY of a message. > When I try it, rmail-beginnig-of-message puts point at the real > beginning of the message. I think it is better not to change that. Sorry, it was my mistake. I was using rmail-mime package which makes that function behave differently. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org