From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: defvaralias Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:29:22 -0600 (CST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200310280229.h9S2TM915327@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200310280125.h9S1PYw15256@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067308600 21318 80.91.224.253 (28 Oct 2003 02:36:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 02:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 28 03:36:37 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AEJin-0005eK-00 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:36:37 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AEJin-0006h7-00 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:36:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEJhs-0007DI-AA for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:35:40 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEJha-0007CS-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:35:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEJh4-0006vK-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:35:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEJgY-0006oX-Qd; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9S2YIKk021724; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:34:18 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id h9S2TM915327; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:29:22 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on 28 Oct 2003 11:08:01 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17487 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17487 Miles Bader wrote: Removing a variable alias _does_ seem like a useful function, so wouldn't it make more sense to make the code follow the doc-string? I have no strong opinion on the subject. I just want the function and its doc string to be in sync, which can be accomplished either way. But one of the two needs to be done. Sincerely, Luc.