From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undocumented hyperlinks in doc strings. Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:22:08 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200310201522.h9KFM8e07959@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200310090050.h990oIa15681@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310100327.h9A3REl20310@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310150138.h9F1cWg10456@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310170332.h9H3WSC25439@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310190114.h9J1EdL03115@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310200224.h9K2O8505226@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066663705 25259 80.91.224.253 (20 Oct 2003 15:28:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 20 17:28:23 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ABbxH-0007tT-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:28:23 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ABbxH-0001a8-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:28:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ABbwK-0002Cc-No for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ABbwE-0002CG-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:27:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ABbvi-00020m-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ABbvh-0001zD-FO; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:26:45 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9KFQiKk007393; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:26:44 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id h9KFM8e07959; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:22:08 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on 20 Oct 2003 10:44:16 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17265 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17265 Stefan Monnier wrote: The only way I can think of that won't make newcomment.el's code even more complex (and significantly more ugly) is to accept expressions (rather than just numbers) for comment-add. Then the expression could use syntax-ppss or some such trick to decide whther to evaluate to 1 or 2. Could you take a look at it? Since you are the maintainer of newcomment.el it would be easier for you since you are familiar with the code. (I am not at all.) I took an initial look at it and it seems indeed more complicated than I thought. If it seems too complex for you as the maintainer, it is certainly going to be too complex for me. Sincerely, Luc.