From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: (elisp)Numbers
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:36:20 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200310041536.h94FaKQ18903@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065282167 6277 80.91.224.253 (4 Oct 2003 15:42:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 15:42:47 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 04 17:42:45 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A5oYP-0001r7-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:42:45 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A5oYP-0006nP-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:42:45 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A5oWj-0006VK-Pe
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 11:41:01 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A5oWZ-0006RY-4w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 11:40:51 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A5oW1-0005rh-Vv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 11:40:49 -0400
Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A5oW1-0005q8-BE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 11:40:17 -0400
Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29])
	by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	h94FeFAJ028382
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:40:16 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost)
	by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id h94FaKQ18903;
	Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:36:20 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to
	teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16925
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16925

What do we do with (elisp)Numbers now that integers have 29 bits?  (On
most machines.)  Should all examples in (elisp)Numbers be rewritten
for 29 bits or not?  Note that this would make the examples look
somewhat differently.  Instead of 7 groups of 4 we now would have one
digit "sticking out" to the left.

Sincerely,

Luc.