From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No sources for lisp/international/uni-*.el? Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:56:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20031.31400.99411.903245@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <18822.41538.150077.451125@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18822.52229.644385.706466@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20030.54198.935820.969776@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312783029 10812 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2011 05:57:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 05:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 08 07:57:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqIpj-0002UA-HA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 07:57:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqIpi-00032O-PP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqIpf-000316-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqIpe-0003aR-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.134.1]:47568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqIpe-0003aA-Mz; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:56:58 -0400 Original-Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p785uuqc026637; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:56:56 +0200 Original-Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p785uu1p012768; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:56:56 +0200 Original-Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p785uuvE012767; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:56:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 134.93.134.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143000 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sun, 07 Aug 2011, Richard Stallman wrote: > Could somebody please explain how this issue is different from > the recent one with the CEDET grammar files? > According to my not totally reliable memory, we concluded that both > forms of these files were equally valid as the "source code", > because they were equally handy for making any changes. Hm, for example lisp/international/uni-name.el doesn't look like "the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it". The file rather has the appearence of line noise. ;-)