From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: synchronizing emacs-unicode branch to HEAD Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:27:48 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200309160227.LAA08700@etlken.m17n.org> References: <200309082332.IAA27881@etlken.m17n.org> <200309091212.VAA29412@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1063679627 21185 80.91.224.253 (16 Sep 2003 02:33:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 02:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 16 04:33:44 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19z5ey-0004du-00 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 04:33:44 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19z5hs-0005CF-00 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 04:36:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19z5aS-0002AV-Ur for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19z5ZV-0001ul-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19z5ZR-0001t0-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19z5ZQ-0001rx-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/3.7W-20010518204228) with ESMTP id h8G2Rnu18594; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:27:49 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6/3.7W-20010823150639) with ESMTP id h8G2Rm918240; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:27:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id LAA08700; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:27:48 +0900 (JST) Original-To: schwab@suse.de In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Tue, 09 Sep 2003 14:44:20 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16410 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16410 In article , Andreas Schwab writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: >> I think we can test if c_functions is GC clean or not by >> setting and resetting abort_on_gc before and after calling >> that function. Could you do that and verify it? > I'll try. >> As I don't have ia64 machine, I can't test it. > You can force use of GCPRO on any machine. Ah! You are right. Anyway, I found that you already commited a proper fix. Thank you. Dave Love writes: > If you mean to do gcpro only when it's calling Lisp or specific C, I > doubt that it is worth the trouble, especially as it could break with > a newly-defined c_function. > I don't think it's worth worrying about optimizing use of gcpro. > There are probably no modern systems where it can't be turned off if > anyone cares, at least with gcc. Ok, I see. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org