From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: synchronizing emacs-unicode branch to HEAD Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:15:29 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200309100115.KAA00628@etlken.m17n.org> References: <200309082332.IAA27881@etlken.m17n.org> <20030909203229.GA28335@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1063158398 2656 80.91.224.253 (10 Sep 2003 01:46:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 10 03:46:35 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19wu43-0003OB-00 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 03:46:35 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19wu4D-0006r5-00 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 03:46:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19wu3b-0001Fn-Am for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19wta8-0000WD-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19wta3-0000UU-TF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:15:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19wtZz-0000SW-U9; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:15:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/3.7W-20010518204228) with ESMTP id h8A1FTu22020; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:15:29 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6/3.7W-20010823150639) with ESMTP id h8A1FT928676; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:15:29 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id KAA00628; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:15:29 +0900 (JST) Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20030909203229.GA28335@fencepost> (message from Miles Bader on Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:32:29 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16254 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16254 In article <20030909203229.GA28335@fencepost>, Miles Bader writes: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:32:34AM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote: >> I hope this branch can be merged into HEAD before the HEAD >> branch is changed drastically. > I'm wondering about the opposite question: should I worry about the unicode > merge, with respect to my own branches? How pervasive are the changes > (fairly concentrated into certain areas, or affecting every nook-and-cranny > of emacs)? Almost all changes are about character and fontset handling; charset.[ch], coding.[ch], fontset.c are mostly re-written, character.[ch] and chartab.c are newly created. So, if your change depends on macros in old charset.h and coding.h, you must pay big attention to the change. Otherwise, I think you don't have to worry about the unicode merge that much. > When I get the time I'll probably import the new unicode branch into arch > and check it out for myself ... actually I suppose you probably merged from > HEAD too early to get my arch-tagging changes; would you mind if I make that > same change to your CVS unicode branch? I don't mind as far as that change doesn't make future merging of emacs-unicode-2 into HEAD difficult. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org