From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Botcazou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Anyone built Emacs with gcc-3.3? Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:40:42 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200307142139.56290.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> References: <200307141747.h6EHlCu26117@green.twinsun.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058211680 20740 80.91.224.249 (14 Jul 2003 19:41:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretesters@gnu.org, simon.marshall@misys.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ishikawa@yk.rim.or.jp Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 14 21:41:18 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19c9CH-0005OB-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:41:17 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19c9Pf-0001VI-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:55:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19c9CM-0004aZ-Qe for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19c9B7-0003HW-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19c9Aj-00033d-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:39:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.libertysurf.net ([213.36.80.91]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19c98J-0002Qe-V6; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (213.36.36.186) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.026) id 3F0A7975001321E7; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:37:05 +0200 Original-To: Paul Eggert User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 In-Reply-To: <200307141747.h6EHlCu26117@green.twinsun.com> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15601 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15601 > As I understand it, the bug does not always occur: it depends on the > layouts of the earlier segments. So it's possible that Eric's patch > happened to fix the problem for his particular alignment, even though > it shouldn't fix the problem in general (and didn't work for me). Yes, and I recently learnt that this whole business could simply be avoided by specifying -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss on the command line... -- Eric Botcazou