From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: --without-xim is ignored. Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:40:16 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200307032340.IAA28023@etlken.m17n.org> References: <200307020505.OAA12367@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057275745 24892 80.91.224.249 (3 Jul 2003 23:42:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 04 01:42:23 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19YDiZ-0006TE-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 01:42:23 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19YDqh-0000R9-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 01:50:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19YDht-0005Tw-IX for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 19:41:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19YDh7-0005Bz-Mp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 19:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19YDgm-0004If-P6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 19:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: from tsukuba.m17n.org ([192.47.44.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19YDgi-0003og-98 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 19:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2])h63NeHu13101; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:40:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) h63NeH906299; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:40:17 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id IAA28023; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:40:16 +0900 (JST) Original-To: d.love@dl.ac.uk In-reply-to: (message from Dave Love on Thu, 03 Jul 2003 22:54:32 +0100) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15355 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15355 In article , Dave Love writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: >> It seems that the configure option --without-xim is ignored >> in the latest HEAD. Is it intentional? > I guess not, now that it's a runtime option. What was the intention > of that configure option? I don't know. But I got a bug report from a person who always built Emacs with that option. He doensn't want XIM on Emacs because C-\ is eaten by XIM in his environment. As this option has been there from 21.1, it should not be ignored. > If it's still required, perhaps it should just disable > HAVE_X_I18N? Does that macro indicate anything else > useful? I don't know. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org