From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:47:50 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306041547.h54FloT26044@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306041404.h54E4SO30552@f7.net> (karl@freefriends.org)
Karl Berry wrote:
I don't like the divergent conditionals either. However, I think it
would be ok to simply say in info.texi, `Emacs Info does it this way,
and standalone Info does it that way'. I think that would be clear to
users of both programs. Better than (effectively) having two different
manuals with the same name, anyway.
I usually use the Emacs version of Info. Occasionally I will invoke
the standalone version from an xterm. Because the manual tends to say:
`Emacs Info does it this way, and standalone Info does it that way'
(although in the case I pointed out, it forgot to do so), I can use
both in an effective way without being surprised by the differences.
Presenting the user with two different manuals (regardless of how this
would be implemented internally) would make this nearly impossible to
achieve (instead of nearly trivial, as it is now).
In the case at hand, I believe it would probably have to say
(depending on what we decide to do):
"If you use standalone Info or use Emacs Info and set
Info-hide-note-references to nil..."
Sincerely,
Luc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-04 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-04 14:04 Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info Karl Berry
2003-06-04 14:26 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-04 15:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-04 15:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-04 15:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-04 16:55 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-04 17:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-05 2:38 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-05 3:23 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-05 5:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-05 13:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-06 9:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-06 11:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-06 15:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-05 5:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-05 10:58 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-04 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-04 15:47 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2003-06-05 10:57 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-05 12:27 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-06 0:11 ` Kim F. Storm
2003-06-05 22:55 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-05 23:11 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-05 23:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-05 23:56 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-06 2:02 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-06 13:28 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-06 9:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-06 13:02 ` David Kastrup
2003-06-08 1:09 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-08 1:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-08 2:30 ` David Kastrup
2003-06-09 8:53 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-06 14:00 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-06 15:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-06 16:54 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-06 17:25 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-06-08 1:07 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-15 15:47 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-06-15 16:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-15 22:27 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-16 12:02 ` Reiner Steib
2003-06-16 18:45 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-15 17:46 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-06-16 5:46 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-06-15 19:00 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-06 17:24 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-06-07 11:46 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-06 17:03 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-05 16:50 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-05 20:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-06 16:05 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-06 16:29 ` Luc Teirlinck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-09 23:17 Karl Berry
2003-06-11 0:24 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-08 13:48 Karl Berry
2003-06-08 16:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-06-09 23:00 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-05 16:30 Karl Berry
2003-06-05 16:44 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-05 23:39 ` Kim F. Storm
2003-06-06 17:03 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-05 12:59 Karl Berry
2003-06-05 15:52 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-05 16:23 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-05 18:19 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-06 17:02 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-04 23:12 Karl Berry
2003-06-05 0:39 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-04 8:54 Richard Stallman
2003-06-04 9:06 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-04 15:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-04 21:54 ` David Kastrup
2003-06-12 6:47 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-06-12 22:13 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-13 3:58 ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-06-13 5:00 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-13 5:10 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-06-13 6:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-05 2:47 ` Kim F. Storm
2003-06-05 13:04 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-10 0:03 ` Kim F. Storm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200306041547.h54FloT26044@eel.dms.auburn.edu \
--to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).