From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Files in wrong subdirs of emacs/lisp? Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 14:38:41 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20030524143523.8511.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20030522132432.955B.JMBARRANQUERO@laley.wke.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053780034 21104 80.91.224.249 (24 May 2003 12:40:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 12:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 24 14:40:31 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19JYK7-0005UF-00 for ; Sat, 24 May 2003 14:40:31 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19JYWL-0007Mx-00 for ; Sat, 24 May 2003 14:53:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19JYJQ-00074w-QT for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 24 May 2003 08:39:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19JYIz-0006Ql-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2003 08:39:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19JYIb-0005Ci-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2003 08:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.terra.es ([213.4.129.129] helo=tsmtp10.mail.isp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19JYIO-0004C2-Nr; Sat, 24 May 2003 08:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.40.54.244] ([81.40.54.244]) by tsmtp10.mail.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id HFE5SH02.2YK; Sat, 24 May 2003 14:38:41 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.06.02 Original-cc: ttn@glug.org Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14191 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14191 On Fri, 23 May 2003 18:49:04 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > We can call something obsolete when we have positive reason to believe > it is *not useful* any more. Perhaps it's just semanthics, but I wouldn't call "still useful" to something if no one uses it. /L/e/k/t/u