From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Zap-to-char behaviour Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 10:56:00 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200305221556.h4MFu0m10423@eel.dms.auburn.edu> References: <20030522072349.D7FED40FAE@kraid.nerim.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053626813 20122 80.91.224.249 (22 May 2003 18:06:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu May 22 20:06:50 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19IuSn-0005EF-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 20:06:49 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19IueB-0007dA-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 20:18:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Iu8Q-0008P3-68 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 13:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19ItlF-0002UA-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 13:21:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19IsoO-0002nz-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:21:32 -0400 Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19IsQB-0006oV-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:55:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108]) h4MFtvoc009099; Thu, 22 May 2003 10:55:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id h4MFu0m10423; Thu, 22 May 2003 10:56:00 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: jmarant@nerim.net In-reply-to: <20030522072349.D7FED40FAE@kraid.nerim.net> (message from Jérôme Marant on Thu, 22 May 2003 09:23:49 CEST) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14098 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14098 J. Marant wrote: Luc Teirlinck a écrit : > Actually, not putting the unwanted character in the kill ring might be > an extra argument for providing `zap-up-to-char', but I personally do > not use zap-to-char sufficiently often to have strong opinions on the > issue. Why would we want to put the unwanted character in the kill ring? I meant that I have no strong opinions on whether zap-up-to-char should be provided. If it is provided then the non-killed character should obviously not be put in the kill ring. Sincerely, Luc.