From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Feature request] face property `raise'
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:23:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030513212308.GB340@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67B8CED503F3D511BB9F0008C75DAD66054855FF@dewdfx17>
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Wedler, Christoph wrote:
> > c. category attribute
> > ii. obsolete, use the symbol as an additional face (with lowest
> > prio)
> > That would be necessary.
>
> Same as above (backward-compatibility).
Your code is not a replacement for category -- category does much more.
So why do you keep saying it's necessary only for `backward-compatibility'?
> Without extra checks for backward-compatibility properties ('category'
> etc) and if the above answer is b, there don't need to be a difference
> with the efficiency. Otherwise, there might be...
Do you have any evidence or reasoning to support this conclusion?
It sounds like your change would end up checking for many more properties...
-Miles
--
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
-- Walter Hines Page
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-13 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-13 17:17 [Feature request] face property `raise' Wedler, Christoph
2003-05-13 21:23 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2003-05-14 21:04 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14 17:45 Wedler, Christoph
2003-05-14 20:57 ` Miles Bader
2003-05-15 15:42 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-29 18:19 Wedler, Christoph
2003-05-13 1:47 ` Richard Stallman
2003-05-13 2:22 ` Miles Bader
2003-05-14 21:05 ` Richard Stallman
2003-05-13 14:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-05-14 21:04 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-11 19:34 Wedler, Christoph
2003-04-13 11:22 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-10 18:48 Wedler, Christoph
2003-04-10 23:14 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-04-09 18:06 Wedler, Christoph
2003-04-09 18:50 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-10 6:23 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-08 17:52 Wedler, Christoph
2003-04-08 18:54 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-07 17:33 Wedler, Christoph
2003-04-08 6:45 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030513212308.GB340@gnu.org \
--to=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).