From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [larsi@gnus.org: Re: [jidanni@dman.ddts.net: uniquify-ignore-buffers-re for gnus users?]] Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:36:11 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200304291536.h3TFaBXR005724@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051631035 22074 80.91.224.249 (29 Apr 2003 15:43:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 29 17:43:53 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19AXFF-0005b0-00 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:42:13 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19AXNx-0002jD-00 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:51:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19AXFo-0002o0-08 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:42:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19AXET-0002Tp-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:41:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19AXBw-0001qk-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:38:51 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19AX9R-0000m0-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:36:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3TFaDx6005726; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:36:13 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h3TFaBXR005724; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:36:11 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13549 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13549 > Do people think this change would be a good idea? Sounds good to me. Ideally uniquify should detects such cases automatically, but nobody has done the required coding, so until that happens setting uniquify-ignore-buffers-re is a good compromise. Stefan > ------- Start of forwarded message ------- > X-Now-Playing: Pole's _45-45_: "Arena" > To: rms@gnu.org > Cc: Dan Jacobson > Subject: Re: [jidanni@dman.ddts.net: uniquify-ignore-buffers-re for gnus > users?] > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEWAj4xweXFQU1FhamFn > dG11g338WlKRAAACXElEQVR4nE2UQZPbIAyFtTPlHo3h3uL03ljsfVmUO0yt//9X+gTebJ2ZHPiQ > 9PQkm3IdZrQeo5DMOErOmfb+psolcbRRo8h+5PnQvdPWilQVVa1y7HKB3JHCuMTmRPLxAjfa3i1Y > bEX1FPkffN5r6gEsmoIer1Ttl7GZCzKuleVY4IN+/E7DmBPIYI7tAkThpzcR7NYhA7CJrFThY7UX > bD6IyXIAvN1W3zgnSx1JRRzU8G0IJBgLI5dQ1v4FzLqXj9okC+2SnIROvQdygOsLvBOdirMePILH > BHB3L9D1GRBj6B6NeIXDgTDm4WDKXQCq9rxzd62XAoypVN2E7rL/WW1AL/WAEtxKEY94zoiOH1Rt > GEt1cBepfbaH+5j5GI9YI1KVhuIuNVy2JN60xY3urQGYe9inKR0DiGWjsrWEAvTtC2MmKvQ4tVrH > 5b7OOaHHykr31B42Q6ZllhBRNSoV/luffm5XceOzaI0ArbDdUHqZDH+xmdpIkI9HeqWygYkgGQCu > DDTSPWb6OFRKowJNZ00YdpgGQMiIsQGw9ben9xjCzBXmngiJenDEuk3nwdEHtpsEIX5p+TKrGyu2 > RGpae4bW3OBO58Dmw93yBU5bqoYHADwqVnrt5hqxD8uButZFkAl/gbe5DLqKQH5attuziddodbBX > hppl4kjRU+2tVGjtk5FL4DRr7CIlKsY51BuCjvH4xCvqQN1e99Q7pX4qNnSnvANETMbpVLaVA58H > ykiFU9ThtAaPT8nuLw6Afywwm2t92xdoOG/K8bl2zsFUVWKMRVPkcS1Xw3tQ2j/3Y8m+U/+P4wAA > AABJRU5ErkJggg== > Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:06:55 +0200 > In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's > message of "Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:46:28 -0400") > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.4 required=5.0 > tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, > SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT > version=2.41 > X-Spam-Level: > > Richard Stallman writes: > > > Do you want to add a recommendation for Gnus users to this doc string, > > or perhaps change the default for the variable? > > [...] > > > uniquify-ignore-buffers-re's Documentation: *Regular expression > > matching buffer names that should not be uniquified. For instance, > > set this to "^draft-[0-9]+$" to avoid having uniquify rename draft > > buffers... > > > > Well, I wish the documentation would say what it should be for gnus users! > > This buffer I'm writing in right now is called "*unsent wide reply to > Richard Stallman*", and all the other Message buffers follow the same > pattern, but the buffers change name from "*unsent..." to "*sent..." > upon sending. So perhaps changing the default value of > `uniquify-ignore-buffers-re' to "^\\*\\(un\\)?sent " might be an idea. > > But I've never used uniquify, so I'm not sure what uniquify users > would expect. > > - -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > ------- End of forwarded message ------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-devel mailing list > Emacs-devel@gnu.org > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel >