From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:52:18 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200304260752.QAA08195@etlken.m17n.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051343842 30046 80.91.224.249 (26 Apr 2003 07:57:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 07:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 26 09:57:21 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199KYj-0007oT-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:57:21 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 199Kfp-0004T4-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:04:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 199KZP-00032S-02 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 03:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 199KYd-0002YZ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 03:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 199KWF-0001AS-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 03:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: from tsukuba.m17n.org ([192.47.44.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 199KU4-0000Oo-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 03:52:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2])h3Q7qKo08642; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:52:20 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) h3Q7qJA09943; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:52:19 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id QAA08195; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:52:18 +0900 (JST) Original-To: jas@extundo.com In-reply-to: (message from Simon Josefsson on Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:35:37 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13464 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13464 In article , Simon Josefsson writes: > (Same configuration as last mail) > Cut'n'paste the following string into a new file and save it: > Горбачев > UTF-8 isn't shown as an option, and indeed selecting UTF-8 destroys > the data. Doesn't Emacs CVS support the entire Unicode repertoire? > (The string above, encoded as shift_jis, is, according to od -x: > 0000000 4384 8084 8284 7184 7084 8984 7584 7284) Those characters belongs to the charset japanese-jisx0208, and the current Emacs still can't encode them into UTF-8. How did you get such characters? --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org