unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
Subject: Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence'
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:47:12 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303250147.TAA24995@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303250125.KAA06703@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:25:18 +0900 (JST))

Kenichi Handa wrote:
   
   I'm not sure it is a good idea to extend dotimes and make it
   different from Commong Lisp.

I agree that this would be a bad idea.

I find the name `sequence' for the new function confusing, however,
since it looks so analogous to `list', `string' and `vector', 'making 
(sequence from to type) look like a synonym for:
(type from to).  Would the name `interval' not be better?  After all,
an interval is exactly what the function returns.

Sincerely,

Luc.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-25  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-23  3:02 request for a new function, say, `sequence' Kenichi Handa
2003-03-24 15:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-03-25  0:15   ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-25  0:50     ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-25  0:57       ` Stefan Monnier
2003-03-25  1:25         ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-25  1:47           ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2003-03-25  1:51             ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-03-25  1:59             ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-25  2:29               ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-03-25  1:57           ` Satyaki Das
2003-03-25  2:08             ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-25  2:41               ` Satyaki Das
2003-03-25  4:46                 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-25  5:05                   ` Satyaki Das
2003-03-25  5:40                     ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-25 20:10                       ` Satyaki Das
2003-03-26  0:18                         ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-26  1:44                           ` Satyaki Das
2003-03-26  2:38                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-03-26  7:31                             ` Edward O'Connor
2003-03-26  8:48                               ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-03-26 12:18                                 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-27  3:30                                   ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-03  2:54                                     ` Kenichi Handa
2003-04-03  3:44                                       ` Miles Bader
2003-04-03 22:52                                         ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-03 10:41                                       ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-04-04  2:11                                         ` Vinicius Jose Latorre
2003-04-04 22:23                                           ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-05  2:10                                             ` Vinicius Jose Latorre
2003-04-06  2:00                                               ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-08  8:10                                               ` Kenichi Handa
2003-04-03 22:52                                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-03-25 15:27                   ` Stefan Monnier
2003-03-25 23:11                     ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-26  0:11                       ` Miles Bader
2003-03-26  0:40                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-03-26  1:34                           ` Miles Bader
2003-03-26  0:54                         ` Kenichi Handa
2003-03-26  1:29                           ` Miles Bader
2003-03-26 15:44                       ` Stefan Monnier
2003-03-27  0:09                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-03-27 15:20                           ` Stefan Monnier
2003-03-27 15:53                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-03-27 16:06                               ` Stefan Monnier
2003-03-27 17:03                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-03-27 17:08                                   ` Stefan Monnier
2003-03-26  2:41               ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200303250147.TAA24995@eel.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).