From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: info
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:03:41 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301300203.UAA07806@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301300143.TAA07576@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:43:01 -0600 (CST))
>From my previous message:
It would be better if RETURN actually went to the desired node in
the situations I described, but again, I do not see how to get the
"best of both worlds".
To be more explicit: not going anywhere is a lot better than going the
wrong place. As mentioned before, I am more worried about confusion
than convenience.
Sincerely,
Luc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-30 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-29 1:33 info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-29 3:53 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-29 6:29 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 19:57 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 5:46 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 21:17 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-01-29 17:33 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 20:39 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-29 23:21 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 5:48 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-30 8:39 ` info Kai Großjohann
2003-01-30 15:11 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 16:30 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 20:02 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-30 20:51 ` info Kai Großjohann
2003-01-30 22:37 ` info Robert J. Chassell
2003-01-31 1:51 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-31 13:05 ` info Robert J. Chassell
2003-01-31 20:22 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-01 1:22 ` info Robert J. Chassell
2003-01-29 21:17 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-01-30 0:31 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 1:43 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 2:03 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
[not found] <84smvc2guf.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de>
2003-01-29 14:20 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-30 15:21 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-01-30 16:21 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-31 19:20 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-02-01 1:22 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-01 22:11 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-02-02 4:59 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-02 5:44 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-02-02 6:09 ` info Miles Bader
2003-02-03 14:40 ` info Stefan Monnier
2003-02-03 19:00 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-03 19:16 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-03 19:19 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-04 15:41 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-02-05 6:08 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-02-05 20:07 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-09 4:45 ` info Luc Teirlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200301300203.UAA07806@eel.dms.auburn.edu \
--to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).