From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: skeleton.el machinery eats newlines.
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 15:44:04 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301112144.PAA28393@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301100436.WAA27007@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 9 Jan 2003 22:36:00 -0600 (CST))
The bug in sh-get-indent-info I mentioned earlier in this thread may
have been a "fake", depending on the answer to the question below.
It only occurred because I was experimenting with C-c C-c
without a #!-line. Hence the code thought it was right after the
#!-line, while it was actually at the beginning of the buffer.
Can we just assume that people NEVER use (or never should use)
shell-scripts without a #!-line? If one just writes a shell-script
for personal use and only plans to use it from a specific shell the
#!-line is strictly speaking not necessary. Actually, bash even has a
strange, apparently little known, feature: if you do not put in a
#!-line, the subshell executing the script remembers hashed pathnames.
With the #!-line it does not. I personally always have a #!-line,
except when I inadvertently forget it or erase it, as I did in this
case.
So can we just assume that there must be a #!-line, in which case
there is no bug in sh-indent-info, or not?
Sincerely,
Luc Teirlinck.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-11 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-08 4:29 skeleton.el machinery eats newlines Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-10 4:36 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-10 6:24 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-10 15:33 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 0:21 ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-11 2:35 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 19:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-12 17:10 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12 19:05 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 21:44 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2003-01-11 21:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 22:27 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 23:45 ` Glenn Morris
2003-01-11 23:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12 0:34 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12 1:20 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12 2:22 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-20 4:25 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 19:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-11 21:29 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12 5:23 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12 6:14 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-17 20:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-18 1:43 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-18 20:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-19 1:02 ` Luc Teirlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200301112144.PAA28393@eel.dms.auburn.edu \
--to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).