unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: skeleton.el machinery eats newlines.
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 15:44:04 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301112144.PAA28393@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301100436.WAA27007@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 9 Jan 2003 22:36:00 -0600 (CST))

The bug in sh-get-indent-info I mentioned earlier in this thread may
have been a "fake", depending on the answer to the question below.

It only occurred because I was experimenting with C-c C-c
without a #!-line.  Hence the code thought it was right after the
#!-line, while it was actually at the beginning of the buffer.

Can we just assume that people NEVER use (or never should use)
shell-scripts without a #!-line?  If one just writes a shell-script
for personal use and only plans to use it from a specific shell the
#!-line is strictly speaking not necessary.  Actually, bash even has a
strange, apparently little known, feature: if you do not put in a
#!-line, the subshell executing the script remembers hashed pathnames.
With the #!-line it does not.  I personally always have a #!-line,
except when I inadvertently forget it or erase it, as I did in this
case.

So can we just assume that there must be a #!-line, in which case
there is no bug in sh-indent-info, or not?

Sincerely,

Luc Teirlinck.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-01-11 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-08  4:29 skeleton.el machinery eats newlines Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-10  4:36 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-10  6:24   ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-10 15:33     ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11  0:21     ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-11  2:35       ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 19:27       ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-12 17:10         ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12 19:05           ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 21:44   ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2003-01-11 21:49     ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 22:27     ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 23:45     ` Glenn Morris
2003-01-11 23:49       ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12  0:34         ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12  1:20           ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12  2:22             ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-20  4:25               ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-11 19:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-11 21:29   ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12  5:23   ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-12  6:14   ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-17 20:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-18  1:43   ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-18 20:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-01-19  1:02   ` Luc Teirlinck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301112144.PAA28393@eel.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).