From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs in CVS as today does not build - emacs depends on *.elc, which cannot be built without emacs
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:43:04 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200211041543.gA4Fh4t23859@rum.cs.yale.edu>
References: <20021104001439.8888.LEKTU@terra.es> <200211041453.gA4ErpR23403@rum.cs.yale.edu>  <20021104163006.F482.LEKTU@terra.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036425610 28455 80.91.224.249 (4 Nov 2002 16:00:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>,
   Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Steven Tamm <steventamm@mac.com>,
   emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 188jdr-0007NV-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:59:55 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 188jlS-00009J-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:07:46 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 188jcx-0007Ep-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:58:59 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 188jQ1-0001gK-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:45:37 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 188jPb-0001Za-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:45:35 -0500
Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 188jNa-000157-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:43:06 -0500
Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost)
	by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA4Fh4t23859;
	Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:43:04 -0500
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
Original-To: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9112
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9112

> > The question was: do you care whether you have to say
> > 
> > 	make bootstrap
> > or
> > 	make clean bootstrap
> > 
> > when you want to do your consistency-check bootstrap ?
> 
> No, of course I don't care as long as it's clearly documented somewhere

It should probably be documented at the same place as the fact
that after modifying lisp.h `make' will not rebuild all the .o files
that depend on lisp.h and that you might thus need a `make clean' as
well.


	Stefan