From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: last try (was: while-no-input) Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:55:52 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200211041455.gA4EtqF23410@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200210012119.g91LJW922045@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210022143.g92LhXQ28321@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210031553.g93FrwH31218@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210041559.g94Fx9006880@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xr8egzom4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200210240720.g9O7KxV11421@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xelagp218.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200210251344.g9PDi3W20508@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210291945.g9TJjlU18481@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210311803.g9VI3hM30498@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200211020407.gA2472v07516@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036422801 12369 80.91.224.249 (4 Nov 2002 15:13:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188iuJ-0003BI-00 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:12:51 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 188j1t-0007ZE-00 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:20:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188iph-0006fq-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:08:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188idz-0002FX-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188idt-0002Dd-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:55:57 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188ids-0002D5-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:55:53 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA4EtqF23410; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:55:52 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9106 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9106 > > Please don't ask me to spend more time on this. > > I have lots of other work to do, and I've made the decision. > But this decision is just wrong. > I think it is right, so what can I say? How about rebuffing the arguments you excised ? You're not really attempting to justify your position. This is slightly dictatorial and very frustrating. Stefan