From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs in CVS as today does not build - emacs depends on *.elc, which cannot be built without emacs Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:53:51 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200211041453.gA4ErpR23403@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200211030224.gA32Omb10688@rum.cs.yale.edu> <20021104001439.8888.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036422840 12605 80.91.224.249 (4 Nov 2002 15:14:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stefan Monnier" , Andreas Schwab , Steven Tamm , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188iuq-0003Dx-00 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:13:24 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 188j2Q-0007ZJ-00 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:21:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188ipb-0006bB-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:07:59 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188ic8-0001a1-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:54:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188ic0-0001Vx-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188iby-0001VP-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA4ErpR23403; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:53:51 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by rum.cs.yale.edu id gA4ErpR23403 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9107 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9107 >=20 > On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 21:24:47 -0500 > "Stefan Monnier" wrote: >=20 > > Does anybody care ? > > As I said, I almost never bootstrap >=20 > Well, I bootstrap daily. Some days more than once. >=20 > Mostly as a test, to check that it still bootstraps. It=B4s not unheard= of > that a change in the sources breaks bootstrapping *precisely* because > bootstrapping, being almost unnecesary, is often not checked after a > change. The question was: do you care whether you have to say make bootstrap or make clean bootstrap when you want to do your consistency-check bootstrap ? Stefan