From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jay_finger@hotmail.com: Two problems in Emacs-21.2.91 on Windows] Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:13:23 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20021023140751.2AB1.LEKTU@terra.es> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035375278 24434 80.91.224.249 (23 Oct 2002 12:14:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andrewi@gnu.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il, jay_finger@hotmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 184KPD-0006LT-00 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:14:35 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 184KQt-0005n1-00 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:16:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 184KOq-0000fQ-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 184KO8-0000K9-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:13:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 184KO6-0000Jo-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 184KO5-0000JF-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9NCDOC15855; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:13:24 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.06 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8686 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8686 On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 03:10:35 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > The other hack that seems to work OK (it links and runs with caveats as > above), is to just remove the definitions of _heap_init and _heap_term from > w32heap.c. The comment above those says "They are normally defined by the > runtime, but we override them here so that the unnecessary HeapCreate call > is not performed." If it's just an extra heap that we're worried about, > this should be slightly wasteful but harmless. Also, we could perhaps get the heap handle (via GetProcessHeap ?) and call HeapDestroy. /L/e/k/t/u