From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ilya Zakharevich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what? Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:58:19 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20021010005818.GC3346@math.berkeley.edu> References: <5lu1jvfp9c.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210100029.JAA19642@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034211708 28244 127.0.0.1 (10 Oct 2002 01:01:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 01:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu.emacs.help/news/@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17zRhw-0007LB-00 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 03:01:44 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17zSWF-0008TO-00 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 03:53:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17zRfb-0008Jn-00; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:59:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17zReg-0006OW-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17zRee-0006OL-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from gold.math.berkeley.edu ([169.229.58.61] helo=Math.Berkeley.EDU) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17zRee-0006OH-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from powdermilk.math.Berkeley.EDU (powdermilk.Math.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.140.13]) by Math.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9A0wJ0n005646; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: (from ilya@localhost) by powdermilk.math.Berkeley.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA07303; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Kenichi Handa Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200210100029.JAA19642@etlken.m17n.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8492 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8492 On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:29:12AM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote: > > It could also look at the CHARSET_REGISTRY and CHARSET_ENCODING property > > of the font (rather than assuming it's the same as in the fontname) ? > > To get those properties, we must call XListFontsWithInfo > which, I think, is very slow compared with XListFonts. > Perhaps, we must introduce a variable, for instance, > `unreliable-font-registry-encoding-name-list, use > XListFontsWithInfo only to find a font whose > registry-encoding matches with this variable. OK, if you do this, please put '-cronix-*' fonts there. It is a horrible thing what they did. > > BTW, I agree that the fontset management could be made simpler (I think > > it's not just a question of the doc being dense or incomplete). > > Especially in your case, there should be some way to say something like: > > > (fontset-prefer-font 'cyrillic-iso8859-5 "-etl-fixed-*-iso8859-5") > > Is that intention different from this? > > (dolist (fontset (fontest-list)) > (set-fontset-font fontset 'cyrillic-iso8859-5 > '("etl-fixed" . "iso8859-5"))) Would not work if there is no etl-fixed fonts on the site? Ilya