From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:43:33 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200210022143.g92LhXQ28321@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200210012119.g91LJW922045@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033714170 8145 127.0.0.1 (4 Oct 2002 06:49:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 06:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17xMHB-000277-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:49:29 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17xN2g-0001Su-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:38:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xLft-00017S-00; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 02:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wrHM-0004Nc-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wrHK-0004NE-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17wrHJ-0004N8-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g92LhXQ28321; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:43:33 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8370 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8370 > It is a general principle that to avoid using abnormal > condition handling for programmed control flow. > I think it is very unclean to treat ordinary input > like a quit and then distinguish them later. > So I don't think we should add this mechanism. > > It is easy enough to do the job using input-pending-p. > You can use > > (catch 'input > (... > (if (input-pending-p) (throw 'input nil)) > ...)) > > if you want to avoid testing input-pending-p at various > levels in the code. That is not very useful if inside this body you use library functions that take a long time to complete, such as file-operations that dispatch to ange-ftp: you'd have to sprinkle (if (input-pending-p) (throw 'input nil)) all over the ange-ftp code, just to help some unrelated package like icomplete. Stefan