From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:51:31 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200210012051.g91KpVi21016@f7.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033505580 5481 127.0.0.1 (1 Oct 2002 20:53:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, hattons@speakeasy.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17wU0i-0001Pb-00 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 22:52:52 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17wUl3-0002DJ-00 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:40:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17wU10-0001CJ-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:53:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wTzi-0000zT-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wTzQ-0000yV-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:51:49 -0400 Original-Received: from consort.superb.net ([209.61.216.22] helo=f7.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17wTzQ-0000yR-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g91KpVi21016; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:51:31 -0400 Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8309 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8309 But note that `m Foo RET' will ignore the second one. That's ok, since there are other ways of using it. I think it makes the rules simpler not to merge them. In practice, I don't think it matters, because I doubt there are any such entries as these: * Foo: (foo)bar. * Foo: (foo)baz. At least I've never seen any. The preceding `Foo' is always different.