From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:42:15 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <20021001163757.A8B4.LEKTU@terra.es>
References: <20020930085834.54FF.LEKTU@terra.es> <E17wGM7-0006gZ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033483510 17863 127.0.0.1 (1 Oct 2002 14:45:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:45:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17wOGq-0004dk-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:45:08 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17wP13-0001er-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 17:32:53 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wOH3-0007yo-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:45:22 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wOEL-0006Zu-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:42:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wOE8-0006MF-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:42:31 -0400
Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17wOE7-0006It-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:42:19 -0400
Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143])
	by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g91EgFE13806;
	Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:42:15 +0200
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <E17wGM7-0006gZ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.06
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8296
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8296

On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 02:18:03 -0400, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:

> Doing it in the first line is cleaner.

Curious. There's no single .el file in the HEAD with no-byte-compile in
the first line, while there are about 10 (some of them automatically
generated) with no-byte-compile in a Local Variables section.

                                                           /L/e/k/t/u