From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:47:53 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <20020906123406.9D40.LEKTU@terra.es>
References: <20020904163125.510C.LEKTU@terra.es> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020905070514.10374E-100000@is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031309413 31843 127.0.0.1 (6 Sep 2002 10:50:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:50:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17nGgm-0008HT-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:50:12 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17nHGu-00052x-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:27:32 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17nGiM-0006Ha-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 06:51:50 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17nGfg-0005qE-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 06:49:04 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17nGfc-0005nk-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 06:49:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17nGfb-0005ji-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 06:48:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143])
	by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86AlrB19107;
	Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:47:53 +0200
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020905070514.10374E-100000@is>
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.05
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7613
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7613

On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:08:09 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> wrote:

> How about if you invoke command.com explicitly, like this:
> 
> 	command.com /c for .... >>foo.txt

I couldn't make it work, it didn't write any directory to subdirs.el.

> If it does the job, there's nothing ugly about it.

BTW, would it be OK to install some of the lisp/makefile.w32-in changes
into 21_1_RC? That way the update-subdirs target would at least work in
NT/2K/XP platforms. (And the WINS/WINS_WITHOUT_TERM hack can be
installed if necessary to make it work also in 95/98/Me.)


                                                           /L/e/k/t/u