From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.. Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:52:04 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200208280652.g7S6q4i13261@wijiji.santafe.edu> References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030517815 2873 127.0.0.1 (28 Aug 2002 06:56:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 06:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17jwl3-0000kC-00 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:56:53 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17jxGj-0003a5-00 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:29:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17jwmQ-0005sA-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:58:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17jwgU-0004vY-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17jwgR-0004uj-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17jwgQ-0004uO-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7S6qW516371; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:52:32 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g7S6q4i13261; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:52:04 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@wijiji using -f Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-Reply-To: <5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7024 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7024 I think there is no harm in supporting F3 and F4 as well as C-x (, C-x ) and C-x e and C-x C-k, if users like F3 and F4. We could take a poll and ask them.