From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: jdsmith@as.arizona.edu, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu,
miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, simon.marshall@misys.com,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: comint read-only prompt
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:36:28 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208201836.NAA06130@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208201721.g7KHLcb09801@wijiji.santafe.edu> (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:21:38 -0600 (MDT))
Richard Stallman wrote:
It seems rather inconsistent to me to make the newest prompt read-only
and not the other prompts.
JD Smith wrote:
So there are three options for old prompts:
1. Leave them read-only by virtue of a read-only text-property.
Any attempt to kill or delete any part of the entirety of
older prompts generates an error.
2. Leave them read-only by virtue of modification and
insert-in-front-hooks. Attempts to delete any part of the
prompts signals an error, but the entire prompt can be killed
without complaint.
3. Leave them read-write.
I believe there is one single important reason to make the latest
prompt read-only: it corresponds to the current command line. This
reason does not apply to old prompts.
I quite often want to edit or "clean up" comint application buffers.
Option 1 forces one to play around with inhibit-read-only to
accomplish this. Option 1 is currently implemented in ielm. It is
extremely inconvenient.
I prefer option 3. Option 2 might work too.
Sincerely,
Luc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-20 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-19 8:24 comint read-only prompt Marshall, Simon
2002-08-19 10:59 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-19 15:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-19 15:57 ` JD Smith
2002-08-19 23:45 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-20 16:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-21 0:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-21 15:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-21 0:11 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-20 17:21 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-20 18:03 ` JD Smith
2002-08-20 21:17 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-20 22:01 ` JD Smith
2002-08-21 0:18 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-21 1:24 ` JD Smith
2002-08-21 1:36 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-21 15:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-20 18:36 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2002-08-20 21:12 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-20 23:23 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-08-21 11:05 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-22 1:57 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-22 2:21 ` JD Smith
2002-08-22 2:35 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-24 2:33 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-19 23:41 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-19 20:46 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-21 0:23 ` Noah Friedman
2002-08-21 0:23 ` Noah Friedman
2002-08-21 1:21 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-21 1:38 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-21 1:32 ` JD Smith
2002-08-21 15:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-22 1:21 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-22 7:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-24 2:32 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208201836.NAA06130@eel.dms.auburn.edu \
--to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jdsmith@as.arizona.edu \
--cc=miles@lsi.nec.co.jp \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
--cc=simon.marshall@misys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).