From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:47:00 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200208132247.g7DMl0607244@wijiji.santafe.edu> References: <200207271853.g6RIrf310840@aztec.santafe.edu> <200208090738.g797clg11797@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200208101716.g7AHGqc05959@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200208121558.g7CFw0K29043@rum.cs.yale.edu> <8011-Mon12Aug2002202814+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029278858 32065 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2002 22:47:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, Jens.Schmidt27@epost.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ekRs-0008Kw-00 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:47:36 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17ekqb-0001Wl-00 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:13:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17ekSn-0007a4-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:48:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17ekRr-0007P7-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17ekRp-0007Of-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:47:34 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17ekRo-0007Ni-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7DMlO506174; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:47:24 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g7DMl0607244; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:47:00 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@wijiji using -f Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il In-Reply-To: <8011-Mon12Aug2002202814+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6510 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6510 Strictly speaking, it isn't correct even for Windows, as this example shows: c: + bar -> c:./bar, not c:/bar I don't understand this example, partly because the two parts are not labeled as to what they mean. "c: + bar -> c:./bar" could be a statement of what something actually does (what something?), or it could be a statement of what something ought to do. I can't tell which.