From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:47:48 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200208130147.g7D1lm507016@wijiji.santafe.edu> References: <200207200035.g6K0ZAb27891@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207212015.g6LKF4c00874@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207251807.g6PI75d07615@aztec.santafe.edu> <874renlito.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <200207271853.g6RIre710837@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207310554.g6V5ssc16508@aztec.santafe.edu> <200208021743.g72HhkX01596@aztec.santafe.edu> <200208071424.g77EO1103149@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200208091639.g79Gd9mf003557@santafe.santafe.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029203284 27281 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2002 01:48:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: neil@ossau.uklinux.net, raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17eQmu-00075e-00 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 03:48:01 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17eRBC-0005uQ-00 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:13:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17eQnn-0007Ow-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:48:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17eQmu-00077V-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:48:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17eQms-00076h-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17eQmr-00076B-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:47:57 -0400 Original-Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7D1m7510701; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:48:07 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g7D1lm507016; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:47:48 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@wijiji using -f Original-To: marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de In-Reply-To: (message from Marius Vollmer on 12 Aug 2002 15:40:33 +0200) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6489 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6489 Yes, but you might not be able to avoid to call a function during a critical section that calls SCM_TICK without you wanting it. Perhaps critical sections could set a flag that tells SCM_TICK not to really do anything.