From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Several serious problems Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:26:46 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200208120026.JAA24485@etlken.m17n.org> References: <200207221711.g6MHBZo02496@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207231335.WAA25692@etlken.m17n.org> <200207240325.g6O3PdX04898@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207240437.NAA26632@etlken.m17n.org> <200208090744.g797irF11925@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029112048 7373 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2002 00:27:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, spiegel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17e33M-0001ug-00 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 02:27:24 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17e3R8-0004Vy-00 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 02:51:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17e348-0008AE-00; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17e33Q-0008A0-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17e33O-00089o-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from tsukuba.m17n.org ([192.47.44.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17e32q-000895-00; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.11.6/3.7W-20010518204228) with ESMTP id g7C0Qkl02082; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:26:47 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.3/3.7W-20010823150639) with ESMTP id g7C0Qk903301; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:26:46 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id JAA24485; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:26:46 +0900 (JST) Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu In-Reply-To: <200208090744.g797irF11925@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.1.30 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6452 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6452 In article <200208090744.g797irF11925@rum.cs.yale.edu>, "Stefan Monnier" writes: >> If the specified coding system is totally inappropriate for >> the buffer, highlighting them will results in huge amount of >> overlays and also it takes long time to finish the job. If > That was also my concern, but I heard that Emacs-20 did just that. Emacs 20 highlighted at most 256 such characters. And, in Emacs 20, detecting unencodable characters was easier because there's no coding system that can encode a part of a charset. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@etl.go.jp