From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display issues / line wrapping Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 03:15:32 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200208090715.g797FXN11631@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028877322 16318 127.0.0.1 (9 Aug 2002 07:15:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 07:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17d3zV-0004F5-00 for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 09:15:21 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17d4Lx-00066c-00 for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 09:38:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17d40F-0006Fq-00; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 03:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17d3zk-0006EP-00 for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 03:15:36 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g797FXN11631; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 03:15:33 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Karl Eichwalder Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6382 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6382 > I forgot to mention that I'm using > > (setq scroll-conservatively 1) There's indeed a bug, but I believe it only occurs if you set scroll-conservatively to something larger than 1 (which you would have done if you had read the docstring carefully. I agree that it's not necessarily obvious, tho). Stefan