From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Run coding system auto-detection manually?
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:01:57 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200208080701.g7871vx04204@wijiji.santafe.edu>
References: <vafheialn58.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <vafk7n4e2pj.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <200208070824.RAA17705@etlken.m17n.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028790101 5174 127.0.0.1 (8 Aug 2002 07:01:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:01:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17chIi-0001LL-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 09:01:40 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17cheg-0006C6-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 09:24:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17chJQ-0006cw-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 03:02:24 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17chJ2-0006QW-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 03:02:00 -0400
Original-Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7872E513798;
	Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:02:14 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g7871vx04204;
	Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:01:57 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@wijiji using -f
Original-To: handa@etl.go.jp
In-Reply-To: <200208070824.RAA17705@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi
	Handa on Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:24:55 +0900 (JST))
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6358
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6358

    So, for the case of a precious file, I think we must check
    VISIT (if that is string) instead of FILENAME in
    find-operation-coding-system.  What do you think about the
    this patch?

It seems right to me.