From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:52:29 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200208011652.g71GqTm18781@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020611083341.2609I-100000@is>
	<87adppy67u.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
	<3405-Fri21Jun2002183331+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
	<871yaz2tf8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87k7nbacm7.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028220759 13510 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 16:52:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17aJBl-0003Vn-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:52:37 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17aJUX-0003RN-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 19:12:01 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17aJCB-0002VY-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:53:03 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17aJBf-0002Tz-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:52:31 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g71Gqf518947;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:52:41 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g71GqTm18781;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:52:29 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org
In-Reply-To: <87k7nbacm7.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob
	Browning on Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:03:44 -0500)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6227
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6227

    and I'll send the patch once I've cleaned it up.  Given that patch,
    the lread.c fix,

Which lread.c fix is that?  Is it installed in the current sources?