From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should lisp/Makefile.in custom-deps be using EMACS or emacs?
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:07:28 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207251807.g6PI7S207666@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <87k7o86ycp.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
	<200207091852.g69Iq3A13934@aztec.santafe.edu> <87vg76qsjh.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027620591 4617 127.0.0.1 (25 Jul 2002 18:09:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 18:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Xn3e-0001CL-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:09:50 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17XnJ3-0003DQ-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:25:45 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Xn3t-000633-00; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:10:05 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Xn1S-0005f3-00; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:07:35 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6PI7ZB05956;
	Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:07:35 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g6PI7S207666;
	Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:07:28 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org
In-Reply-To: <87vg76qsjh.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob
	Browning on Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:10:26 -0500)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6043
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6043

In the case that fails, can you try running by hand under GDB the
command that actually uses cus-dep.el and step through the code in
init_lread which sets up load-path, to see why the installed Lisp
directories end up in the value?  That's the only way to
figure this out.  Treating it as a black box won't get anywhere.