From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs and guile (Re: ehelp woes, or why I hate a module that I
 love so much)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:54:33 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207191654.g6JGsX526997@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <20020704135240.4CBB.LEKTU@terra.es>
	<ilu4rffy4nm.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<20020704164911.4CC1.LEKTU@terra.es> <tx1adorvz5m.fsf_-_@raeburn.org>
	<200207181455.g6IEtvc25102@aztec.santafe.edu> <tx1wursvlo9.fsf@raeburn.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027097811 10505 127.0.0.1 (19 Jul 2002 16:56:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 16:56:51 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Vb3i-0002jK-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:56:50 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17VbGB-0001nt-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:09:43 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Vb3j-0002zb-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:56:51 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Vb1a-0002qL-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:54:38 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6JGsgB11467;
	Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:54:42 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g6JGsX526997;
	Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:54:33 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: raeburn@raeburn.org
In-Reply-To: <tx1wursvlo9.fsf@raeburn.org> (message from Ken Raeburn on Thu,
	18 Jul 2002 16:13:58 -0400)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5910
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5910

    +AC_ARG_WITH(union-type,
    +[  --with-union-type       use union type for lisp object representation
    +                             (slows performance, better compile-time checks)])

--with options are supposed to be used only for stating whether to use
specific other software packages.  So you can't use --with here.

It looks like there is no standard form of argument that you can use.
I think you should leave this out.