From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs and guile (Re: ehelp woes, or why I hate a module that I love so much) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:13:54 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020717090936.F3CE.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020704164911.4CC1.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026890131 11838 127.0.0.1 (17 Jul 2002 07:15:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 07:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Uj22-00034p-00 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:15:30 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17UjDL-0006CI-00 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:27:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Uj1s-0006MY-00; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 03:15:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Uj0m-0006Kf-00 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 03:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6H7DqM23340; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:13:53 +0200 Original-To: Ken Raeburn In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.03 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5816 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5816 On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:58:13 -0400, Ken Raeburn wrote: > So, that's roughly what the current status is of my work.... Thanks *a lot* for your comments. /L/e/k/t/u