From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mentioning variable aliases in `describe-variable' Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:26:59 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020712122612.2E85.LEKTU@terra.es> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026469683 3353 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2002 10:28:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sxed-0000ry-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:28:03 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17SxoT-0005b2-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:38:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sxeq-00038P-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:28:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sxdd-000373-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6CAQxM03555; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:26:59 +0200 Original-To: John Paul Wallington In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5701 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5701 On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:47:24 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote: > I guess it does look cleaner without it. Even in long variables with the Value: header, IMO. Any opposition to removing the "Documentation:" header? /L/e/k/t/u